CPU
GPU
Phenom X3 8450
Core i3-380M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X3 8450 is positioned at rank 1023 and the Core i3-380M is on rank 11, so the Core i3-380M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X3 8450
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-380M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom X3 8450 | Core i3-380M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($147) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Toliman (2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom X3 8450 | Core i3-380M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+484%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($147) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X3 8450 and Core i3-380M
Phenom X3 8450
The Phenom X3 8450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,221 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i3-380M
The Core i3-380M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,212 points. Launch price was $49.
Processing Power
The Phenom X3 8450 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i3-380M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X3 8450 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X3 8450 versus 0.53 GHz on the Core i3-380M — a 119.4% clock advantage for the Phenom X3 8450. The Phenom X3 8450 uses the Toliman (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-380M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X3 8450 scores 1,221 against the Core i3-380M's 1,212 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom X3 8450. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8450 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-380M.
| Feature | Phenom X3 8450 | Core i3-380M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz+296% | 0.53 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Toliman (2008) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,221 | 1,212 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 450 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom X3 8450 uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-380M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom X3 8450 | Core i3-380M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2+ | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X3 8450) / VT-x (Core i3-380M). The Core i3-380M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Gen 1)), while the Phenom X3 8450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-380M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.
| Feature | Phenom X3 8450 | Core i3-380M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Gen 1) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Phenom X3 8450 launched at $145 MSRP, while the Core i3-380M debuted at $49. At current prices ($147 vs $25), the Core i3-380M is $122 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom X3 8450 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 48.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-380M — making the Core i3-380M the 141.5% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom X3 8450 | Core i3-380M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $145 | $49-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $147 | $25-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | 48.5+484% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom X3 8450 and Core i3-380M
