
Processor N50 vs Athlon II X2 270

Processor N50

Athlon II X2 270
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Processor N50 is positioned at rank 1066 and the Athlon II X2 270 is on rank 825, so the Athlon II X2 270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Processor N50
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 270
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Processor N50 | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($120) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Processor N50 | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+696%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($120) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor N50 and Athlon II X2 270

Processor N50
The Processor N50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon II X2 270
The Athlon II X2 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $100.
Processing Power
Both the Processor N50 and Athlon II X2 270 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Processor N50 versus 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Processor N50 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Athlon II X2 270 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N50 scores 1,339 against the Athlon II X2 270's 1,333 — a 0.4% lead for the Processor N50. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N50 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 270.
| Feature | Processor N50 | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+240% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 10 nm-78% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,339 | 1,333 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 392 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 686 |
Memory & Platform
The Processor N50 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Athlon II X2 270 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor N50 | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Processor N50) / true (Athlon II X2 270). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270 rivals Pentium E6700.
| Feature | Processor N50 | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Processor N50 launched at $128 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 270 debuted at $72. At current prices ($120 vs $15), the Athlon II X2 270 is $105 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor N50 delivers 11.2 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 270 — making the Athlon II X2 270 the 155.4% better value option.
| Feature | Processor N50 | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128 | $72-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $15-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2 | 88.9+694% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















