Processor N50 vs Athlon X2 340
Processor N50
Athlon X2 340
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Processor N50 is positioned at rank 1066 and the Athlon X2 340 is on rank 462, so the Athlon X2 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Processor N50
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 340
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Processor N50 | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($120) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Processor N50 | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+696%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($120) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor N50 and Athlon X2 340
Processor N50
The Processor N50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon X2 340
The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Processor N50 and Athlon X2 340 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Processor N50 versus 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 340 (base: 1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Processor N50 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Athlon X2 340 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N50 scores 1,339 against the Athlon X2 340's 1,333 — a 0.4% lead for the Processor N50.
| Feature | Processor N50 | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+220% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+100% | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,339 | 1,333 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 397 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 549 |
Memory & Platform
The Processor N50 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Athlon X2 340 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor N50 | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Processor N50) / AMD-V (Athlon X2 340). Primary use case: Athlon X2 340 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Processor N50 | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Processor N50 launched at $128 MSRP, while the Athlon X2 340 debuted at $30. At current prices ($120 vs $15), the Athlon X2 340 is $105 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor N50 delivers 11.2 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 340 — making the Athlon X2 340 the 155.4% better value option.
| Feature | Processor N50 | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128 | $30-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $15-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2 | 88.9+694% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Processor N50 and Athlon X2 340
