Processor N50 vs Celeron G1610T

Processor N50

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Celeron G1610T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Processor N50

2 / 2

1,339

+0.5%

1,333

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Processor N50 is positioned at rank 1066 and the Celeron G1610T is on rank 575, so the Celeron G1610T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Processor N50

#1054

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

2805%

#1055

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

2764%

#1056

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2537%

#1057

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

2526%

#1058

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

2503%

#1060

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2417%

#1061

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2317%

#1062

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2314%

#1063

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2251%

#1066

Processor N50

MSRP: $128|Avg: $120

100%

#1067

Athlon II N350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#1068

Celeron N3350

MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A

99%

#1070

Core i7-2675QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

99%

#1071

A9-9410

MSRP: $150|Avg: $25

99%

#1073

A8 Pro-7150B

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

98%

#1074

A9-9420

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

98%

#1075

Celeron B730

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

98%

#1078

A9-9425

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

97%

#1080

Core i5-4402E

MSRP: $266|Avg: $100

96%

#1081

A6-7000

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1610T

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

9821%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

9280%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

6738%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

2030%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

1608%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

1407%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

806%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

795%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

724%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

724%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

716%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

696%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

687%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

684%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

678%

#278

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

MSRP: $549|Avg: $116

97%

#575

Celeron G1610T

MSRP: $42|Avg: $42

100%

#576

Athlon X4 750K

MSRP: $91|Avg: $17

100%

#577

Core i7-7700K

MSRP: $305|Avg: $140

99%

#578

Core i5-7600K

MSRP: $217|Avg: $84

99%

#579

FX-6300

MSRP: $132|Avg: $35

99%

#581

Core i3-6100T

MSRP: $117|Avg: $20

98%

#582

Athlon X4 970

MSRP: $85|Avg: $85

98%

#583

FX-8370

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

98%

#584

Pentium G4520

MSRP: $86|Avg: $45

98%

#585

Core i3-4170

MSRP: $117|Avg: $40

98%

#586

Celeron G460

MSRP: $37|Avg: $10

98%

#587

A4 PRO-7350B

MSRP: $50|Avg: $11

97%

#589

Pentium G3220T

MSRP: $54|Avg: $15

96%

#590

Celeron G1620

MSRP: $52|Avg: $40

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Processor N50 (2023) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Processor N50	Celeron G1610T
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($120)	✅ More affordable ($42)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron G1610T (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Processor N50	Celeron G1610T
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+184%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($120)	✅ More affordable ($42)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Processor N50 Benchmark Check

Celeron G1610T Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Processor N50 and Celeron G1610T

Processor N50

The Processor N50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G1610T

The Celeron G1610T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Processor N50 and Celeron G1610T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Processor N50 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G1610T — a 38.6% clock advantage for the Processor N50 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Processor N50 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron G1610T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N50 scores 1,339 against the Celeron G1610T's 1,333 — a 0.4% lead for the Processor N50. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N50 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610T.

Feature	Processor N50	Celeron G1610T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+48%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.3 GHz+130%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+200%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-N (2023)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,339	1,333
Geekbench 6 Single	—	393
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	674

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor N50 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Celeron G1610T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Processor N50	Celeron G1610T
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	✅
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Processor N50) / VT-x (Celeron G1610T). The Celeron G1610T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Processor N50 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610T rivals Pentium G2020T.

Feature	Processor N50	Celeron G1610T
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

The Processor N50 launched at $128 MSRP, while the Celeron G1610T debuted at $42. At current prices ($120 vs $42), the Celeron G1610T is $78 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor N50 delivers 11.2 pts/$ vs 31.7 pts/$ for the Celeron G1610T — making the Celeron G1610T the 96% better value option.