Ryzen 5 2500U vs Xeon X5675
Ryzen 5 2500U
Xeon X5675
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen 5 2500U is positioned at rank 106 and the Xeon X5675 is on rank 998, so the Ryzen 5 2500U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 2500U
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5675
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 5 2500U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($349) | ✅ More affordable ($22) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raven Ridge (2017−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 5 2500U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1468%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($349) | ✅ More affordable ($22) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon X5675
Ryzen 5 2500U
The Ryzen 5 2500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 26 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,494 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon X5675
The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2500U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5675 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5675 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2500U versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2500U (base: 2 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2500U uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5675 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2500U scores 6,494 against the Xeon X5675's 6,418 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 2500U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2500U vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2500U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+4% | 3.46 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.06 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12288 kB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,494+1% | 6,418 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 818 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,310 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2500U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5675 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Ryzen 5 2500U versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5675 — the Ryzen 5 2500U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 2500U) vs 3 (Xeon X5675). Chipset compatibility: FP5 (Ryzen 5 2500U) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5675).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2500U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 2500U) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675). The Ryzen 5 2500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon X5675 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2500U targets Mainstream Laptop, Xeon X5675 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2500U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 2500U launched at $349 MSRP, while the Xeon X5675 debuted at $1440.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2500U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-76% | $1440 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $22 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon X5675
