PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,287 vs 21,550).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,287 vs 21,550).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U better than Ryzen 5 5600?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is ahead with a 9.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 5600 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 5600 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 5600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
1080p
low	161 FPS	265 FPS
medium	130 FPS	240 FPS
high	112 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	232 FPS
medium	113 FPS	191 FPS
high	95 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	161 FPS
medium	69 FPS	134 FPS
high	55 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	92 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
1080p
low	508 FPS	390 FPS
medium	419 FPS	323 FPS
high	351 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	250 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	327 FPS
medium	375 FPS	282 FPS
high	323 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	220 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	245 FPS
medium	268 FPS	216 FPS
high	243 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	170 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
1080p
low	539 FPS	532 FPS
medium	526 FPS	532 FPS
high	483 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	527 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	532 FPS
medium	434 FPS	532 FPS
high	396 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	439 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	494 FPS
medium	298 FPS	434 FPS
high	255 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	305 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
1080p
low	539 FPS	532 FPS
medium	539 FPS	532 FPS
high	539 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	532 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	532 FPS
medium	539 FPS	532 FPS
high	539 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	532 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	532 FPS
medium	448 FPS	501 FPS
high	398 FPS	444 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	381 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x-7500, DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,287 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U's 21,287 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	6 MB+1100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark	21,550+1%	21,287
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5600 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U — the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Socket	AM4	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	5600+139900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+52428700%	256
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs true (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.