PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 7 7840U.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 24,547).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7840U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Ryzen 7 7840U

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 7 7840U.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 24,547).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840U better than Ryzen 5 5600?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7840U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 24.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 13.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7840U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840U is the better fit. You are getting 13.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840U is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7840U is 101.0% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 24.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600 is also 76.5% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 61.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7840U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 7 7840U
1080p
low	161 FPS	257 FPS
medium	130 FPS	237 FPS
high	112 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	228 FPS
medium	113 FPS	191 FPS
high	95 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	159 FPS
medium	69 FPS	134 FPS
high	55 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	92 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 7 7840U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 7 7840U
1080p
low	508 FPS	477 FPS
medium	419 FPS	395 FPS
high	351 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	306 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	417 FPS
medium	375 FPS	364 FPS
high	323 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	270 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	275 FPS
medium	268 FPS	251 FPS
high	243 FPS	238 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	206 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 7 7840U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 7 7840U
1080p
low	539 FPS	614 FPS
medium	526 FPS	614 FPS
high	483 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	614 FPS
medium	434 FPS	614 FPS
high	396 FPS	526 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	452 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	525 FPS
medium	298 FPS	459 FPS
high	255 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	345 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 7 7840U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 7 7840U
1080p
low	539 FPS	614 FPS
medium	539 FPS	614 FPS
high	539 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	614 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	614 FPS
medium	539 FPS	614 FPS
high	539 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	549 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	560 FPS
medium	448 FPS	502 FPS
high	398 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	384 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 7 7840U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 7 7840U

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 7840U

The Ryzen 7 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 24,547 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7840U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840U — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen 7 7840U's 24,547 — a 13% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840U. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840U.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 7 7840U
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	21,550	24,547+14%
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 7 7840U
Socket	AM4	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7840U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 7 7840U
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7840U debuted at $400. On MSRP ($199 vs $400), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 61.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7840U — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 55.3% better value option.