
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 69.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 22,777).
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019Why buy it
- ✅+5.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 69.2 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 69.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.
Why buy it
- ✅+5.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 22,777).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 69.2 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 569 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 222 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 569 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 569 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 569 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 552 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,777 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700's 22,777 — a 5.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,550 | 22,777+6% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 3700). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 debuted at $329. On MSRP ($199 vs $329), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 69.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 44% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-40% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+57% | 69.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












