Ryzen 5 5600 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 26,852).
  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +35.8% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 35.8% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data, 24.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 35.8% more average FPS across 9 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the better fit. You are getting 24.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 35.8% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low161 FPS269 FPS
medium130 FPS243 FPS
high112 FPS204 FPS
ultra93 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low141 FPS236 FPS
medium113 FPS193 FPS
high95 FPS157 FPS
ultra78 FPS139 FPS
4K
low79 FPS164 FPS
medium69 FPS136 FPS
high55 FPS105 FPS
ultra44 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low508 FPS510 FPS
medium419 FPS419 FPS
high351 FPS361 FPS
ultra310 FPS322 FPS
1440p
low447 FPS446 FPS
medium375 FPS386 FPS
high323 FPS332 FPS
ultra277 FPS283 FPS
4K
low313 FPS294 FPS
medium268 FPS266 FPS
high243 FPS251 FPS
ultra209 FPS216 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low539 FPS671 FPS
medium526 FPS671 FPS
high483 FPS647 FPS
ultra414 FPS546 FPS
1440p
low539 FPS671 FPS
medium434 FPS637 FPS
high396 FPS541 FPS
ultra339 FPS464 FPS
4K
low371 FPS541 FPS
medium298 FPS473 FPS
high255 FPS419 FPS
ultra197 FPS355 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low539 FPS671 FPS
medium539 FPS671 FPS
high539 FPS671 FPS
ultra539 FPS671 FPS
1440p
low539 FPS671 FPS
medium539 FPS671 FPS
high539 FPS660 FPS
ultra493 FPS573 FPS
4K
low501 FPS572 FPS
medium448 FPS511 FPS
high398 FPS457 FPS
ultra349 FPS394 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 21.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
8 MB+1500%
Process
7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Vermeer (2020−2025)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
21,550
26,852+25%
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,077
Geekbench 6 Single
2,052
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Socket
AM4
FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop