
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 13,450).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 13,450).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,934 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U's 23,934 — a 10.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,077 vs 13,450 (19.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 2,400, a 15.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 9,500 (9.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,550 | 23,934+11% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | 13,450+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | 2,400+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | 9,500+10% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and FP7,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U rivals Core Ultra 7 164U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












