PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 17,443).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.5% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.5% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 17,443).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7940HS better than Ryzen 5 5600?

Yes. Ryzen 9 7940HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 43.5% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data, 57.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 39.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7940HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 43.5% more average FPS across 9 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7940HS is the better fit. You are getting 57.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 7940HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 43.5% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7940HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7940HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low	161 FPS	267 FPS
medium	130 FPS	242 FPS
high	112 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	235 FPS
medium	113 FPS	193 FPS
high	95 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	163 FPS
medium	69 FPS	136 FPS
high	55 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	92 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 9 7940HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low	508 FPS	497 FPS
medium	419 FPS	408 FPS
high	351 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	311 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	434 FPS
medium	375 FPS	376 FPS
high	323 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	274 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	286 FPS
medium	268 FPS	259 FPS
high	243 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	209 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 9 7940HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low	539 FPS	750 FPS
medium	526 FPS	750 FPS
high	483 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	750 FPS
medium	434 FPS	646 FPS
high	396 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	544 FPS
medium	298 FPS	475 FPS
high	255 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	357 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 9 7940HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low	539 FPS	750 FPS
medium	539 FPS	750 FPS
high	539 FPS	750 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	750 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	750 FPS
medium	539 FPS	750 FPS
high	539 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	574 FPS
medium	448 FPS	511 FPS
high	398 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	394 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen 9 7940HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 9 7940HS

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 7940HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen 9 7940HS's 29,986 — a 32.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,077 vs 17,443 (44.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 2,646, a 25.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 11,591 (29.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 9 7940HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.2 GHz+18%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	21,550	29,986+39%
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	17,443+57%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052	2,646+29%
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	11,591+35%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS).

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen 9 7940HS
Socket	AM4	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.