
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,900 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 83,982).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,900 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 83,982).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 697 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 872 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 106,263 points. Launch price was $4,099.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX's 106,263 — a 132.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,077 vs 83,982 (153.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 3,200, a 43.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 31,000 (113.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 32 / 64+433% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 21,550 | 106,263+393% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | 83,982+658% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | 3,200+56% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | 31,000+260% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX debuted at $4099. On MSRP ($199 vs $4099), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $3900 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 25.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 122.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-95% | $4099 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+318% | 25.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












