
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1736NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon D-1736NT.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-1736NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,826 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon D-1736NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon D-1736NT.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,826 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon D-1736NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 109 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 236 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon D-1736NT


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1736NT
Xeon D-1736NT
The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1736NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1736NT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 is built on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon D-1736NT's 17,826 — a 18.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+26% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+30% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+113% | 15 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 21,550+21% | 17,826 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1736NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Xeon D-1736NT). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












