Ryzen 5 5600 vs Xeon D-2775TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon D-2775TE.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 27,299).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+26.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon D-2775TE.

Why buy it

✅+26.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 27,299).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon D-2775TE?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-2775TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2775TE is the better fit. You are getting 26.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 5600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 20.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon D-2775TE is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 26.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2775TE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Xeon D-2775TE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	161 FPS	177 FPS
medium	130 FPS	146 FPS
high	112 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	144 FPS
medium	113 FPS	115 FPS
high	95 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	68 FPS
medium	69 FPS	58 FPS
high	55 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon D-2775TE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	508 FPS	205 FPS
medium	419 FPS	182 FPS
high	351 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	127 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	176 FPS
medium	375 FPS	161 FPS
high	323 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	114 FPS
medium	268 FPS	106 FPS
high	243 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	75 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon D-2775TE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	539 FPS	682 FPS
medium	526 FPS	581 FPS
high	483 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	441 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	587 FPS
medium	434 FPS	478 FPS
high	396 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	362 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	429 FPS
medium	298 FPS	333 FPS
high	255 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	229 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon D-2775TE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	539 FPS	682 FPS
medium	539 FPS	682 FPS
high	539 FPS	642 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	548 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	659 FPS
medium	539 FPS	573 FPS
high	539 FPS	492 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	450 FPS
medium	448 FPS	403 FPS
high	398 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	309 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon D-2775TE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon D-2775TE

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2775TE

The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-2775TE offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2775TE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE — a 34.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon D-2775TE's 27,299 — a 23.5% lead for the Xeon D-2775TE. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon D-2775TE
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+42%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+28%	25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	21,550	27,299+27%
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.