
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2468
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E-2468.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 26,652).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2468, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E-2468 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2468 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon E-2468
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon E-2468
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E-2468.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 26,652).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2468, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E-2468 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2468 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2468 better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 616 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 666 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 666 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon E-2468


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2468 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E-2468 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E-2468 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon E-2468's 26,652 — a 21.2% lead for the Xeon E-2468. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+33% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 21,550 | 26,652+24% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2468 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Xeon E-2468). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












