
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +177.1% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $74 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 451.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E3-1240
2011Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,361 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon E3-1240
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +177.1% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $74 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 451.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,361 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon E3-1240?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 67 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 134 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon E3-1240


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E3-1240
Xeon E3-1240
The Xeon E3-1240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E3-1240 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon E3-1240's 5,361 — a 120.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+300% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 21,550+302% | 5,361 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1240 debuted at $273. On MSRP ($199 vs $273), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $74 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 19.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1240 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 138.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-27% | $273 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+453% | 19.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












