PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +116.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Delivers 387.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 22.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620 v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2620 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,255 vs 21,550).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.2 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Xeon E5-2620 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +116.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Delivers 387.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 22.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620 v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,255 vs 21,550).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.2 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon E5-2620 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2620 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 116.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better fit. You are getting 132.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 5600 is $218 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it gives you a 116.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 387.9% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 22.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2620 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2620 v4
1080p
low	161 FPS	158 FPS
medium	130 FPS	137 FPS
high	112 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	133 FPS
medium	113 FPS	112 FPS
high	95 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	62 FPS
medium	69 FPS	56 FPS
high	55 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	34 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2620 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2620 v4
1080p
low	508 FPS	188 FPS
medium	419 FPS	170 FPS
high	351 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	121 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	162 FPS
medium	375 FPS	149 FPS
high	323 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	105 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	106 FPS
medium	268 FPS	97 FPS
high	243 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	68 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2620 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2620 v4
1080p
low	539 FPS	231 FPS
medium	526 FPS	231 FPS
high	483 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	231 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	231 FPS
medium	434 FPS	231 FPS
high	396 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	231 FPS
medium	298 FPS	231 FPS
high	255 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	231 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2620 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2620 v4
1080p
low	539 FPS	231 FPS
medium	539 FPS	231 FPS
high	539 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	231 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	231 FPS
medium	539 FPS	231 FPS
high	539 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	231 FPS
medium	448 FPS	231 FPS
high	398 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	231 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2620 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2620 v4

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,255 points. Launch price was $417.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon E5-2620 v4's 9,255 — a 79.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2620 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2620 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+47%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+60%	20 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	21,550+133%	9,255
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2620 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2620 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2620 v4) — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v4).

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2620 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Xeon E5-2620 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2620 v4
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 debuted at $417. On MSRP ($199 vs $417), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 22.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 132% better value option.