
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-2695 v4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 21,550).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-2695 v4.
Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 21,550).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon E5-2695 v4


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 13.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 18 / 36+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+33% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 45 MB+41% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,550+14% | 18,835 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












