
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4669 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,808 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4224.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 2.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-4669 v4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 18,730).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4669 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-4669 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+69.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($7,007 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon E5-4669 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,808 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4224.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 2.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-4669 v4.
Why buy it
- ✅+69.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 18,730).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4669 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($7,007 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon E5-4669 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 75 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 404 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 350 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon E5-4669 v4


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4669 v4
Xeon E5-4669 v4
The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,547 points. Launch price was $7,007.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon E5-4669 v4's 17,547 — a 20.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,077 vs 18,730 (51.4% advantage for the Xeon E5-4669 v4). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 825, a 85.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 2,882 (99.6% advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-4669 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 22 / 44+267% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+59% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 55 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 5.5 MB+1000% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,550+23% | 17,547 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | 18,730+69% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052+149% | 825 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600+198% | 2,882 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E5-4669 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 4 (Xeon E5-4669 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 40 (Xeon E5-4669 v4) — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and C610 (Xeon E5-4669 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1536 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs Yes (Xeon E5-4669 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 debuted at $7007. On MSRP ($199 vs $7007), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $6808 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 2.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 191% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-97% | $7007 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+4232% | 2.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












