
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon L5640
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +123.4% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $797 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2215.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon L5640
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,659 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($996 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon L5640
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +123.4% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $797 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2215.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,659 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($996 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon L5640?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 116 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon L5640


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon L5640
Xeon L5640
The Xeon L5640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,659 points. Launch price was $200.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon L5640 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon L5640 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon L5640 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon L5640's 4,659 — a 128.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5640.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+57% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+55% | 2.26 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 21,550+363% | 4,659 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon L5640 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus DDR3 1333 MHz on the Xeon L5640 — the Xeon L5640 supports 199.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon L5640 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 76.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 3 (Xeon L5640). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 0 (Xeon L5640) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and Intel 5520,Intel X58 (Xeon L5640).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+33% | DDR3 1333 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 288 GB+125% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs true (Xeon L5640). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop, Xeon L5640 targets Server Low Power.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | Server Low Power |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon L5640 debuted at $996. On MSRP ($199 vs $996), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $797 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 4.7 pts/$ for the Xeon L5640 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 183.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon L5640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-80% | $996 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+2204% | 4.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












