Ryzen 5 5600 vs Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

72 Cores288 Thrd245 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +19.7% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon Phi 7290.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 21,550).
  • 276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.7% more average FPS across 24 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better fit. You are getting 20.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 5600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 5600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 72/288. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 5600Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low161 FPS177 FPS
medium130 FPS143 FPS
high112 FPS113 FPS
ultra93 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low141 FPS141 FPS
medium113 FPS111 FPS
high95 FPS87 FPS
ultra78 FPS68 FPS
4K
low79 FPS66 FPS
medium69 FPS56 FPS
high55 FPS43 FPS
ultra44 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 5600Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low508 FPS136 FPS
medium419 FPS120 FPS
high351 FPS109 FPS
ultra310 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low447 FPS120 FPS
medium375 FPS108 FPS
high323 FPS97 FPS
ultra277 FPS77 FPS
4K
low313 FPS87 FPS
medium268 FPS81 FPS
high243 FPS72 FPS
ultra209 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 5600Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low539 FPS446 FPS
medium526 FPS446 FPS
high483 FPS446 FPS
ultra414 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low539 FPS446 FPS
medium434 FPS434 FPS
high396 FPS374 FPS
ultra339 FPS326 FPS
4K
low371 FPS394 FPS
medium298 FPS306 FPS
high255 FPS259 FPS
ultra197 FPS209 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 5600Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low539 FPS446 FPS
medium539 FPS446 FPS
high539 FPS446 FPS
ultra539 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low539 FPS446 FPS
medium539 FPS446 FPS
high539 FPS446 FPS
ultra493 FPS420 FPS
4K
low501 FPS446 FPS
medium448 FPS405 FPS
high398 FPS361 FPS
ultra349 FPS310 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 88.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 18.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600Xeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
72 / 288+1100%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+159%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+133%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
0 kB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Vermeer (2020−2025)
Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark
21,550+21%
17,839
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,077
Geekbench 6 Single
2,052
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600Xeon Phi 7290
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600Xeon Phi 7290
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop