PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,811 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
✅Delivers 249.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon Platinum 8380.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8380 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,600 vs 40,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8380, which brings 40 cores / 80 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8380

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 40 cores / 80 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Xeon Platinum 8380

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,811 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
✅Delivers 249.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon Platinum 8380.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 40 cores / 80 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8380 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,600 vs 40,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8380, which brings 40 cores / 80 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8380 better than Ryzen 5 5600?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8380 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8380 is the better fit. You are getting 365.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 40 cores and 80 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8380 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Platinum 8380 is 910.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,010 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600 is also 249.3% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 31.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8380 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon Platinum 8380
1080p
low	161 FPS	185 FPS
medium	130 FPS	149 FPS
high	112 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	154 FPS
medium	113 FPS	120 FPS
high	95 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	72 FPS
medium	69 FPS	60 FPS
high	55 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon Platinum 8380

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon Platinum 8380
1080p
low	508 FPS	412 FPS
medium	419 FPS	361 FPS
high	351 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	235 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	353 FPS
medium	375 FPS	314 FPS
high	323 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	219 FPS
medium	268 FPS	198 FPS
high	243 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	135 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon Platinum 8380

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon Platinum 8380
1080p
low	539 FPS	935 FPS
medium	526 FPS	817 FPS
high	483 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	680 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	746 FPS
medium	434 FPS	643 FPS
high	396 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	479 FPS
medium	298 FPS	378 FPS
high	255 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	272 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon Platinum 8380

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon Platinum 8380
1080p
low	539 FPS	900 FPS
medium	539 FPS	817 FPS
high	539 FPS	705 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	606 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	703 FPS
medium	539 FPS	617 FPS
high	539 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	454 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	507 FPS
medium	448 FPS	454 FPS
high	398 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	346 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon Platinum 8380

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon Platinum 8380

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Platinum 8380

The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 34 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 97.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 1,300, a 44.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 40,000 (129.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon Platinum 8380
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	40 / 80+567%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+29%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+52%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	60 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	21,550	62,318+189%
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052+58%	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	40,000+365%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8380). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon Platinum 8380
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	6144 GB+4700%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8380 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8380). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop, Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon Platinum 8380
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	Datacenter

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 debuted at $2010. On MSRP ($199 vs $2010), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $1811 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 111% better value option.