
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon W-10885M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+39.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon W-10885M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-10885M, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon W-10885M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Xeon W-10885M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,486 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon W-10885M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+39.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon W-10885M.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-10885M, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon W-10885M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,486 vs 21,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon W-10885M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 195 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 332 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon W-10885M


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M
The Xeon W-10885M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,486 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-10885M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-10885M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-10885M — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10885M (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-10885M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon W-10885M's 15,486 — a 32.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 16 MB on the Xeon W-10885M.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 21,550+39% | 15,486 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10885M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Xeon W-10885M). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












