Ryzen 5 5600
Xeon W-3225
Ryzen 5 5600 vs Xeon W-3225 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 5600 vs Xeon W-3225 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 5600 vs Xeon W-3225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,120 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,319 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 682.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 13.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,319 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon W-3225.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3225 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 11,500).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3225, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3225
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.8 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($1,319 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3225 better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600 vs Xeon W-3225 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon W-3225
The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3225 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3225 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3225 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon W-3225's 18,251 — a 16.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,077 vs 11,500 (3.7% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 1,150, a 56.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 9,100 (5.6% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+94% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+6300% | 8 MB |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,550+18% | 18,251 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | 11,500+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052+78% | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | 9,100+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3225 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3225 — the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3225 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 6 (Xeon W-3225). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 64 (Xeon W-3225) — the Xeon W-3225 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and C621 (Xeon W-3225).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+9% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3225 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop, Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 5600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon W-3225 came in at $1319. On launch pricing ($199 vs $1319), Ryzen 5 5600 was $1120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 13.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3225 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 154.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-85% | $1319 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+685% | 13.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon W-3225
