
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon w5-3525
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,140 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 220.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 290W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon w5-3525.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3525 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 45,311).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3525, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w5-3525
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +70.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($1,339 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌346.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon w5-3525
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,140 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 220.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 290W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon w5-3525.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +70.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3525 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 45,311).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3525, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($1,339 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌346.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-3525 better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 105 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 688 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 594 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 231 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 1045 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 967 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 829 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 994 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 880 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 798 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 395 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 1133 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 999 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 866 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 1061 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 918 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 794 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 791 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 688 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon w5-3525


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon w5-3525
Xeon w5-3525
The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon w5-3525 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon w5-3525 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3525 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon w5-3525's 45,311 — a 71.1% lead for the Xeon w5-3525. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 45 MB+41% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 21,550 | 45,311+110% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 — the Xeon w5-3525 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3525 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3525). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3525) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and W790 (Xeon w5-3525).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 112+367% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-3525 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3525). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-3525 debuted at $1339. On MSRP ($199 vs $1339), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $1140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3525 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 104.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-85% | $1339 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+220% | 33.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












