Ryzen 5 PRO 230
VS
Core Ultra 7 256V

Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs Core Ultra 7 256V

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 PRO 230

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
108%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
102%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
91%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 256V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
105%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
101%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
100%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
96%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 7 256V leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 5 PRO 230Core Ultra 7 256V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 57% cheaper ($150 vs $350) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightRyzen 5 PRO 230Core Ultra 7 256V
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+135%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 230 and Core Ultra 7 256V

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

The Core Ultra 7 256V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,579 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 256V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 256V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 256V — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 scores 19,702 against the Core Ultra 7 256V's 19,579 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,320 vs 2,658, a 13.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,210 vs 11,000 (41.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 256V). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 256V.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 230Core Ultra 7 256V
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+2%
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+59%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB+140%
2.5 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
3 nm-25%
Architecture
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,702
19,579
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,065
Geekbench 6 Single
2,320
2,658+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,210
11,000+53%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses the FP7/FP7r2/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 versus LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s on the Core Ultra 7 256V — the Core Ultra 7 256V supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) vs 8 (Core Ultra 7 256V) — the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket FP7 (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) and Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 256V).

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 230Core Ultra 7 256V
Socket
FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+1500%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+150%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) vs true (Core Ultra 7 256V). Both include integrated graphics Radeon 760M (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) and Intel Arc Graphics 140V (Core Ultra 7 256V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 256V targets Mobile.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 230Core Ultra 7 256V
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 760M
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
true
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 256V debuted at $450. At current prices ($150 vs $350), the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is $200 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 delivers 131.3 pts/$ vs 55.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 256V — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 the 80.5% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 230Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP
$150-67%
$450
Avg Price (30d)
$150-57%
$350
Performance per Dollar
131.3+135%
55.9
Release Date
2025
2024