Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Xeon E7340

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Xeon E7340 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

4 / 8

6,606

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E7340

6,544

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Xeon E7340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Xeon E7340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7340 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E7340

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,544 vs 6,606).
❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U better than Xeon E7340?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7340 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7340 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E7340 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E7340 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Xeon E7340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,606 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E7340

The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is built on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U scores 6,606 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U	Xeon E7340
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	—
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	6,606	6,544

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.