
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2286M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2286M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2286M, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Xeon E-2286M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2286M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,080 vs 15,316).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Xeon E-2286M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2286M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2286M, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Xeon E-2286M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,080 vs 15,316).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE better than Xeon E-2286M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E-2286M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E-2286M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 177 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E-2286M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E-2286M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE and Xeon E-2286M


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,316 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2286M
Xeon E-2286M
The Xeon E-2286M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 15,080 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2286M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E-2286M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2286M — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2286M (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E-2286M uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE scores 15,316 against the Xeon E-2286M's 15,080 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2286M.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E-2286M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+38% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,316+2% | 15,080 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2286M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E-2286M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












