
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4610 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4610 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-4610 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,084 vs 15,316).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Xeon E5-4610 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4610 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,084 vs 15,316).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE better than Xeon E5-4610 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 301 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE and Xeon E5-4610 v4


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,316 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4610 v4
Xeon E5-4610 v4
The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,084 points. Launch price was $1,219.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4610 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 — a 80% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE scores 15,316 against the Xeon E5-4610 v4's 15,084 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4610 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+133% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+83% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 25 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2.5 MB+400% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,316+2% | 15,084 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












