
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8700F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 18,040).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.0 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen 7 8700F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 18,040).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.0 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 767 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 766 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 544 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 338 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 602 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 431 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 8700F


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F
The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 8700F share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 7 8700F's 31,240 — a 16% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 18,040 (25.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 2,649, a 22.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 13,500 (32.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 31,240+17% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | 18,040+29% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | 2,649+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 13,500+39% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 8700F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 8700F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 8700F debuted at $270. On MSRP ($299 vs $270), the Ryzen 7 8700F is $29 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 115.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 8700F — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 26.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $270-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0 | 115.7+30% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












