
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+5.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+5.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 629 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 8840HS


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 8840HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 5.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 26,609+6% | 25,156 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 8840HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












