
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Delivers 73.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Delivers 73.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 168 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 53.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+12% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 26,609+73% | 15,342 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 debuted at $299. On MSRP ($299 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 53.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+73% | 51.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













