PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 6900HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,445 vs 14,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Ryzen 9 6900HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,445 vs 14,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Ryzen 9 6900HS?

Yes. Ryzen 7 5700X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 15.5% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better fit. You are getting 4.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 12.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 6900HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 6900HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 6900HS
1080p
low	156 FPS	251 FPS
medium	129 FPS	234 FPS
high	115 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	220 FPS
medium	111 FPS	186 FPS
high	95 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	154 FPS
medium	67 FPS	131 FPS
high	55 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	89 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen 9 6900HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 6900HS
1080p
low	649 FPS	441 FPS
medium	549 FPS	370 FPS
high	448 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	287 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	370 FPS
medium	484 FPS	323 FPS
high	407 FPS	288 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	255 FPS
medium	303 FPS	229 FPS
high	277 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	186 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen 9 6900HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 6900HS
1080p
low	665 FPS	576 FPS
medium	557 FPS	564 FPS
high	509 FPS	485 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	388 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	576 FPS
medium	458 FPS	510 FPS
high	419 FPS	437 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	355 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	432 FPS
medium	322 FPS	368 FPS
high	292 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	262 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen 9 6900HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 6900HS
1080p
low	665 FPS	576 FPS
medium	665 FPS	576 FPS
high	665 FPS	576 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	576 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	576 FPS
medium	665 FPS	576 FPS
high	607 FPS	576 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	513 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	536 FPS
medium	488 FPS	489 FPS
high	439 FPS	438 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	379 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen 9 6900HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 9 6900HS

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 6900HS

The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 9 6900HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 9 6900HS's 23,040 — a 14.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 13,445 (4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,854, a 13.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 8,732 (10.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HS.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 6900HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+3%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm	6 nm-14%
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark	26,609+15%	23,040
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000+4%	13,445
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116+14%	1,854
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715+11%	8,732

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Ryzen 9 6900HS — the Ryzen 9 6900HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 6900HS) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 6900HS).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 6900HS
Socket	AM4	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 9 6900HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.