
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 62.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 17,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.6 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 62.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 17,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.6 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 690 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 264 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 706 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 710 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 398 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 3900


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,251 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900's 31,251 — a 16% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 17,500 (22.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,688, a 22.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 10,000 (2.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+10% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB+1100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 31,251+17% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | 17,500+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+25% | 1,688 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 10,000+3% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 targets Professional Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 rivals Core i9-10900.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Professional Content Creation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 debuted at $499. On MSRP ($299 vs $499), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 62.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 34.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-40% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+42% | 62.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












