
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 14,670).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+4.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+4.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 14,670).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 15.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 14,670 (4.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,903, a 10.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 10,609 (8.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 26,609+17% | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | 14,670+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+11% | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 10,609+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












