PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Ryzen 7 5700X?

Yes. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 14.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 2.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better fit. You are getting 14.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	156 FPS	269 FPS
medium	129 FPS	243 FPS
high	115 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	236 FPS
medium	111 FPS	193 FPS
high	95 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	164 FPS
medium	67 FPS	136 FPS
high	55 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	92 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	649 FPS	513 FPS
medium	549 FPS	421 FPS
high	448 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	323 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	448 FPS
medium	484 FPS	388 FPS
high	407 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	285 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	295 FPS
medium	303 FPS	267 FPS
high	277 FPS	253 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	217 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	665 FPS	683 FPS
medium	557 FPS	683 FPS
high	509 FPS	647 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	683 FPS
medium	458 FPS	637 FPS
high	419 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	464 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	541 FPS
medium	322 FPS	473 FPS
high	292 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	355 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	665 FPS	683 FPS
medium	665 FPS	683 FPS
high	665 FPS	683 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	683 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	683 FPS
medium	665 FPS	683 FPS
high	607 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	572 FPS
medium	488 FPS	511 FPS
high	439 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	394 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 2.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 16,000 (13.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 2,605, a 20.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 10,348 (6.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.2 GHz+13%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	4 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	8 MB+1500%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	26,609	27,318+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	16,000+14%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116	2,605+23%
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	10,348+7%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Socket	AM4	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.