PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 55,025).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

2025

Why buy it

✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 55,025).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 106.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the better fit. You are getting 106.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP11 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
1080p
low	156 FPS	283 FPS
medium	129 FPS	257 FPS
high	115 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	261 FPS
medium	111 FPS	216 FPS
high	95 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	182 FPS
medium	67 FPS	150 FPS
high	55 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	102 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
1080p
low	649 FPS	667 FPS
medium	549 FPS	575 FPS
high	448 FPS	433 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	375 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	562 FPS
medium	484 FPS	501 FPS
high	407 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	317 FPS
medium	303 FPS	287 FPS
high	277 FPS	254 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	218 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
1080p
low	665 FPS	776 FPS
medium	557 FPS	609 FPS
high	509 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	447 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	674 FPS
medium	458 FPS	536 FPS
high	419 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	392 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	482 FPS
medium	322 FPS	399 FPS
high	292 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	300 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen AI Max+ 395

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
1080p
low	665 FPS	1050 FPS
medium	665 FPS	947 FPS
high	665 FPS	827 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	745 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	834 FPS
medium	665 FPS	742 FPS
high	607 FPS	648 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	562 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	613 FPS
medium	488 FPS	550 FPS
high	439 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	418 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 69.6% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	26,609	55,025+107%
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Socket	AM4	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	8000+199900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+104857500%	128
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+50%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon 8060S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($299 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is $299 cheaper.