
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 43,174).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 43,174).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 97 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 264 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 1021 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 1079 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 912 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 47.5% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 43,174+62% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 8000+199900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($299 vs $600), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 21.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-50% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+24% | 72.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












