
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +130.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen Embedded V2A46
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,999 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen Embedded V2A46
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +130.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,999 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Ryzen Embedded V2A46?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Embedded V2A46 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Embedded V2A46 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 89 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Embedded V2A46 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 125 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Embedded V2A46 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen Embedded V2A46


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Ryzen Embedded V2A46
The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,999 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen Embedded V2A46's 4,999 — a 136.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Embedded V2A46 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+44% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+300% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 26,609+432% | 4,999 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Embedded V2A46 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2A46). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Embedded V2A46 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($299 vs $0), the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is $299 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Embedded V2A46 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













