
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+103.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,040 vs 2,116).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 9,715).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+103.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,040 vs 2,116).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 9,715).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 150 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 687 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 687 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 656 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 584 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 687 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 640 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 578 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 3.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,040, a 68.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 9,000 (7.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 27,487+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+103% | 1,040 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715+8% | 9,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X debuted at $999. On MSRP ($299 vs $999), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $700 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 105.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-70% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+224% | 27.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












