PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅+68.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 171.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 32.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 21,444).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅+53.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,255 vs 2,116).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.8 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($899 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅+68.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 171.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 32.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+53.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 21,444).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,255 vs 2,116).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.8 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($899 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the better fit. You are getting 53.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $600 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $899 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 53.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 171.6% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 32.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	156 FPS	200 FPS
medium	129 FPS	175 FPS
high	115 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	157 FPS
medium	111 FPS	131 FPS
high	95 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	83 FPS
medium	67 FPS	74 FPS
high	55 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	46 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	649 FPS	532 FPS
medium	549 FPS	463 FPS
high	448 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	351 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	471 FPS
medium	484 FPS	417 FPS
high	407 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	302 FPS
medium	303 FPS	267 FPS
high	277 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	213 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	665 FPS	737 FPS
medium	557 FPS	630 FPS
high	509 FPS	584 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	509 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	632 FPS
medium	458 FPS	525 FPS
high	419 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	410 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	461 FPS
medium	322 FPS	371 FPS
high	292 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	274 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	665 FPS	737 FPS
medium	665 FPS	737 FPS
high	665 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	636 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	737 FPS
medium	665 FPS	667 FPS
high	607 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	500 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	515 FPS
medium	488 FPS	468 FPS
high	439 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	364 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 10.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 21,444 (42% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,255, a 51.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 8,814 (9.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+5%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	26,609	29,462+11%
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	21,444+53%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116+69%	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715+10%	8,814

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Socket	AM4	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X debuted at $899. On MSRP ($299 vs $899), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $600 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 32.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 92.3% better value option.