
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 48,756).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 48,756).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 770 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 262 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 1200 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 911 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 806 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 58.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 48,756+83% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+6553500% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX debuted at $799. On MSRP ($299 vs $799), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $500 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 37.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-63% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+46% | 61.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












