
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,196 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 196.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 53,977).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,196 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 196.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 53,977).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 660 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 631 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 783 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 253 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 1212 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 924 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 818 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 949 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 826 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 713 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 609 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 95.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 53,977 (117.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,686, a 22.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 29,745 (101.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 128 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 74,985+182% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | 53,977+286% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+26% | 1,686 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 29,745+206% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX debuted at $2495. On MSRP ($299 vs $2495), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $2196 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 99% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-88% | $2495 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+196% | 30.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












