
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-1680 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-1680 v4
2016Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,945 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon E5-1680 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,945 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon E5-1680 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E5-1680 v4


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-1680 v4
Xeon E5-1680 v4
The Xeon E5-1680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,945 points. Launch price was $1,723.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v4 — a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon E5-1680 v4's 13,945 — a 62.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+60% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 26,609+91% | 13,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Xeon E5-1680 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












