
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-1681 V3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,290 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 854.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1681 V3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-1681 V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 9,715).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($1,589 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon E5-1681 V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,290 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 854.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1681 V3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 9,715).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($1,589 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon E5-1681 V3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1681 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1681 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1681 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1681 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 331 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E5-1681 V3


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-1681 V3
Xeon E5-1681 V3
The Xeon E5-1681 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,820 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-1681 V3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-1681 V3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-1681 V3 — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-1681 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon E5-1681 V3's 14,820 — a 56.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,050, a 67.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 9,000 (7.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1681 V3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1681 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+31% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+17% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+28% | 25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 26,609+80% | 14,820 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+102% | 1,050 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715+8% | 9,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1681 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E5-1681 V3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-1681 V3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-1681 V3) — the Xeon E5-1681 V3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-1681 V3).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1681 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs Yes (Xeon E5-1681 V3). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1681 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1681 V3 debuted at $1589. On MSRP ($299 vs $1589), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $1290 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 9.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1681 V3 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 162.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-1681 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-81% | $1589 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+857% | 9.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












