
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2683 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +66.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2683 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2683 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,686 vs 26,609).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon E5-2683 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +66.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2683 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,686 vs 26,609).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon E5-2683 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E5-2683 v3


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2683 v3
Xeon E5-2683 v3
The Xeon E5-2683 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,686 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2683 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v3 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon E5-2683 v3's 14,686 — a 57.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2683 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+53% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+70% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 35 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 26,609+81% | 14,686 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2683 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












