PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,592 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1090.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697A v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-2697A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,621 vs 26,609).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Xeon E5-2697A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,592 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1090.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697A v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,621 vs 26,609).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon E5-2697A v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2697A v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.3% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better fit. You are getting 23.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $2,592 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $2,891 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1090.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 7.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2697A v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2697A v4
1080p
low	156 FPS	182 FPS
medium	129 FPS	158 FPS
high	115 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	101 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	152 FPS
medium	111 FPS	128 FPS
high	95 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	69 FPS
medium	67 FPS	62 FPS
high	55 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E5-2697A v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2697A v4
1080p
low	649 FPS	364 FPS
medium	549 FPS	330 FPS
high	448 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	224 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	313 FPS
medium	484 FPS	284 FPS
high	407 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	195 FPS
medium	303 FPS	178 FPS
high	277 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	120 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E5-2697A v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2697A v4
1080p
low	665 FPS	541 FPS
medium	557 FPS	541 FPS
high	509 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	541 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	541 FPS
medium	458 FPS	541 FPS
high	419 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	532 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	466 FPS
medium	322 FPS	379 FPS
high	292 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	289 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E5-2697A v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2697A v4
1080p
low	665 FPS	541 FPS
medium	665 FPS	541 FPS
high	665 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	541 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	541 FPS
medium	665 FPS	541 FPS
high	607 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	497 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	541 FPS
medium	488 FPS	515 FPS
high	439 FPS	455 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	381 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E5-2697A v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E5-2697A v4

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2697A v4

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon E5-2697A v4's 21,621 — a 20.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2697A v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+28%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+31%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	40 MB+25%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	4 MB+700%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	26,609+23%	21,621
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2697A v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697A v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2697A v4
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 debuted at $2891. On MSRP ($299 vs $2891), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $2592 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2697A v4 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 169% better value option.