PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,816 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1382.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,711 vs 26,609).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,816 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1382.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,711 vs 26,609).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon E5-2699 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2699 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 13.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better fit. You are getting 7.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $3,816 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $4,115 MSRP, and it gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1382.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 22/44. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2699 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	156 FPS	187 FPS
medium	129 FPS	164 FPS
high	115 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	154 FPS
medium	111 FPS	130 FPS
high	95 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	70 FPS
medium	67 FPS	62 FPS
high	55 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	649 FPS	211 FPS
medium	549 FPS	192 FPS
high	448 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	182 FPS
medium	484 FPS	165 FPS
high	407 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	115 FPS
medium	303 FPS	105 FPS
high	277 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	74 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	665 FPS	618 FPS
medium	557 FPS	618 FPS
high	509 FPS	618 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	618 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	618 FPS
medium	458 FPS	618 FPS
high	419 FPS	590 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	532 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	469 FPS
medium	322 FPS	382 FPS
high	292 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	289 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	665 FPS	618 FPS
medium	665 FPS	618 FPS
high	665 FPS	618 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	614 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	618 FPS
medium	665 FPS	618 FPS
high	607 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	484 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	551 FPS
medium	488 FPS	493 FPS
high	439 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	373 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E5-2699 v4

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon E5-2699 v4's 24,711 — a 7.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	22 / 44+175%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+28%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+55%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	55 MB+72%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	5.5 MB+1000%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	26,609+8%	24,711
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 2400 on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2699 v4 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2699 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2699 v4) — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C612 (Xeon E5-2699 v4).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	2400+59900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+8738033%	1536
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon E5-2699 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 debuted at $4115. On MSRP ($299 vs $4115), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $3816 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 174.7% better value option.