PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,542 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2716.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 3.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8891 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E7-8891 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,500 vs 9,715).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Xeon E7-8891 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,542 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2716.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 3.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8891 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,500 vs 9,715).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon E7-8891 v3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E7-8891 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better fit. You are getting 2.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $6,542 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $6,841 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2716.6% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 3.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Xeon E7-8891 v3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E7-8891 v3
1080p
low	156 FPS	179 FPS
medium	129 FPS	151 FPS
high	115 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	155 FPS
medium	111 FPS	127 FPS
high	95 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	72 FPS
medium	67 FPS	63 FPS
high	55 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E7-8891 v3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E7-8891 v3
1080p
low	649 FPS	370 FPS
medium	549 FPS	335 FPS
high	448 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	223 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	318 FPS
medium	484 FPS	291 FPS
high	407 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	189 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	199 FPS
medium	303 FPS	184 FPS
high	277 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	124 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E7-8891 v3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E7-8891 v3
1080p
low	665 FPS	540 FPS
medium	557 FPS	540 FPS
high	509 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	540 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	540 FPS
medium	458 FPS	540 FPS
high	419 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	540 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	477 FPS
medium	322 FPS	391 FPS
high	292 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	299 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E7-8891 v3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E7-8891 v3
1080p
low	665 FPS	540 FPS
medium	665 FPS	540 FPS
high	665 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	540 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	540 FPS
medium	665 FPS	540 FPS
high	607 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	540 FPS
medium	488 FPS	483 FPS
high	439 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	358 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon E7-8891 v3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E7-8891 v3

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-8891 v3

The Xeon E7-8891 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EX (2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,615 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E7-8891 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E7-8891 v3 — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 uses Haswell-EX (2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon E7-8891 v3's 21,615 — a 20.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 900, a 80.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 9,500 (2.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-8891 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E7-8891 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+31%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	45 MB (total)+41%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Haswell-EX (2015)
PassMark	26,609+23%	21,615
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116+135%	900
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715+2%	9,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E7-8891 v3 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8891 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 32 (Xeon E7-8891 v3) — the Xeon E7-8891 v3 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C602J (Xeon E7-8891 v3).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E7-8891 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	32+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs Yes (Xeon E7-8891 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon E7-8891 v3
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 debuted at $6841. On MSRP ($299 vs $6841), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $6542 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 3.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8891 v3 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 186.3% better value option.