
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6240R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,145 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 552.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 22,500).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6240R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6240R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+60.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon Gold 6240R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,145 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 552.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+60.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 22,500).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6240R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon Gold 6240R?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 154 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 501 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 834 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 834 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 644 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 654 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 562 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 6240R


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6240R
Xeon Gold 6240R
The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R — a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon Gold 6240R's 33,353 — a 22.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 22,500 (46.6% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,212, a 54.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 17,218 (55.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+12% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 24 MB+4700% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 33,353+25% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | 22,500+61% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+75% | 1,212 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 17,218+77% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6240R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6240R) — the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6240R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6240R). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Server / High-load computing |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6240R debuted at $2444. On MSRP ($299 vs $2444), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $2145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6240R — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 146.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-88% | $2444 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+554% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












